Research Approaches and Innovative Development Trends in the Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine


Release Date:

2021-05-25

Research Approaches and Innovative Development Trends in the Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine

 Abstract: Establishing a scientific quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine is crucial for its internationalization and industrialization. By identifying quality marker components through the linkage chain of efficacy–chemical basis–quality control, and by correlating chemical constituents with clinical therapeutic effects, we can assess the efficacy and safety of TCM and thereby achieve a holistic quality evaluation. Starting from the evolution of TCM quality evaluation systems, this paper analyzes both the traditional quality assessment model based on macroscopic characteristics and the modern model centered on active ingredients. Drawing on the organic integration of quality markers (Q-Markers) with multidisciplinary knowledge, the study explores the establishment of a Q-Marker–based quality evaluation framework and proposes innovative approaches to guide the future development of TCM quality assessment.

Traditional Chinese medicine—including crude herbal materials, processed herbal slices, and compound TCM preparations—serves as the material foundation of the TCM industry chain; its quality is the cornerstone for ensuring clinical efficacy and safety. The inadequacy of a comprehensive quality evaluation system across the entire TCM industry chain is one of the key factors hindering its modernization. [1] Our ancestors, drawing on their medicinal experience and clinical knowledge, pioneered a distinctive approach to the quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicines based on their physical characteristics. However, due to the limitations of ancient Chinese science, this approach suffered from significant subjectivity and insufficient scientific rigor. The Chinese Pharmacopoeia addresses these shortcomings by linking clinical efficacy with the active constituents of TCM and establishing chemical-composition-based standards for TCM, thereby ensuring quality control.
Establishing a modern quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine is a systematic undertaking that, guided by the theoretical principles of TCM, fully leverages the strengths of the holistic perspective inherent in TCM, emphasizes the complex interplay of herbal properties and formula compatibility on clinical efficacy, employs multidisciplinary approaches and advanced technologies for comprehensive design, continuously innovates quality evaluation models, and ultimately constructs a quality assessment network centered on therapeutic effectiveness, underpinned by active constituents, and supported by the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge and the synergistic application of multiple technologies and methodologies.

1 Development History of the Quality Evaluation System for Traditional Chinese Medicine

1.1 Development of the Traditional Chinese Medicine Quality Evaluation System

The authenticity and quality of traditional Chinese medicines directly affect the efficacy and safety of clinical use. In ancient texts on TCM, it is common to assess the authenticity and quality of herbs based on their morphological, coloristic, olfactory, and gustatory characteristics. Drawing on long-term clinical experience and accumulated knowledge, ancient Chinese pharmacologists developed a comprehensive system for evaluating the quality of TCM that links these macroscopic traits to the intrinsic properties of the herbs. With the advent of modern precision instruments such as microscopes, the identification of herbal characteristics has advanced to the cellular and molecular levels, thereby reducing the influence of subjective factors on evaluators’ judgments and imbuing the process with greater accuracy and scientific rigor. Renowned TCM scholar Professor Xie Zongwan, building on the theoretical essence and empirical insights passed down through millennia, systematically reviewed and highly endorsed the traditional TCM quality-assessment framework, articulating the principle of “distinguishing quality through characteristic appraisal.” However, systematic research on the correspondence and correlation between “characteristics” and “quality” remains lacking. [2-3] The traditional “morphological identification and quality assessment” system is characterized by its intuitive presentation and ease of operation, thereby playing a crucial role in the quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicines. However, it suffers from significant limitations, including strong subjectivity on the part of the assessor, difficulties in objectively articulating morphological attributes, and challenges in quantifying quality attributes. Fortunately, the use of modern electronic sensory instruments—such as electronic noses, electronic tongues, and texture analyzers—has made it possible to achieve objective, data-driven representation of certain morphological characteristics. [4-6] The core principle of “identifying characteristics and discussing quality” emphasizes, on the basis of empirical observation, the exploration of the relationship between the morphological characteristics of Chinese medicinal materials and their overall quality. However, at present, the intrinsic mechanisms underlying this relationship remain scientifically unexplained; thus, this approach constitutes a rather vague method of evaluation that overlooks the importance of research into formula compatibility, the material basis, and the mechanisms of action of Chinese medicinal prescriptions.

1.2 Development of Modern Quality Evaluation Systems for Traditional Chinese Medicine

Research on the chemical basis of traditional Chinese medicines is crucial for conducting quality evaluation and quality control. Based on the study of active constituents in TCM, identifying key quality-related compounds and establishing limit standards for specific quality indicators enable the assessment of whether a TCM product meets quality requirements, thereby implementing quality control—this “identify components, measure content” approach constitutes the primary research paradigm and methodology for modern TCM quality evaluation and control. Fingerprint profiling is one of the most commonly used analytical methods in TCM quality research; it is characterized by rich information content, strong specificity, holistic nature, and inherent ambiguity, allowing it to provide a macroscopic reflection of the overall chemical profile of TCM and effectively characterize its intrinsic quality. [7-8] The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine is the core of its quality evaluation. Relying solely on chemical analysis to determine the content of individual marker compounds fails to capture the overall therapeutic effect of the formulation. Therefore, research on the spectrum–effect relationship in TCM integrates fingerprint profiling with pharmacological activity, establishing mathematical “spectrum–effect” models to elucidate the material basis of TCM’s therapeutic actions and thereby provide a more comprehensive assessment of TCM quality. [9-11] Due to the inherent variability in the quality of traditional Chinese medicines and the intrinsic complexity of their chemical composition, reliance solely on chemical evaluation methods is insufficient to meet the requirements of a modern quality assessment system for TCM. Biological evaluation, conducted under defined experimental conditions, involves the qualitative or quantitative assessment of the specific biological effects elicited when the test drug interacts with biological systems—ranging from whole animals and isolated tissues and organs to microorganisms, cells, and related biological factors—and thereby provides a holistic appraisal and characterization of the efficacy and safety of TCM. This approach enhances the targeted and specific nature of TCM quality control and, to a certain extent, enriches the scientific rationale underlying the modern TCM quality assessment system in guiding clinical use. [12-15] . Academician Liu Changxiao [16] Taking into account the complexities inherent in traditional Chinese medicinal theory, formula design and formulation, as well as the intricate chemical composition and biosynthetic pathways of TCM, the concept of a quality marker (Q-Marker) for TCM was proposed in 2016. Over the past several years, quality assessment and control based on Q-Markers have emerged as one of the major research focuses in the field of TCM quality evaluation. [17]

2 Based on Q-Marker Research Approach to Quality Assessment

Q-Markers are chemical substances that are either inherently present in traditional Chinese medicinal materials and products or formed during processing and preparation, and are closely associated with the functional properties of these medicines; they serve as indicator compounds that reflect the safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine. [16] Based on the five key attributes of quality—“presence,” “specificity,” “measurability” of critical quality-related substances in crude herbal materials, processed herbal slices, compound formulations, and their preparations; the “correlation between substance and therapeutic effect” as defined by TCM theory; and “traceability and transferability of substances” throughout the product manufacturing process—we propose five principles for the Q-Marker of compound formulations: “efficacy,” “specificity,” “measurability,” “traceability and transferability,” and “compatibility environment.” Essentially, a Q-Marker is a chemically defined component that is closely associated with the therapeutic properties of a particular TCM formula, uniquely characteristic of that formula, possessing a well-defined chemical structure, and amenable to both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The underlying concept is centered on TCM theory and supported by a multidisciplinary knowledge network, aiming to establish a comprehensive linkage among efficacy, material basis, and quality control across multiple dimensions—including the biological attributes of TCM herbs, the compatibility and formulation of TCM compound preparations, and the manufacturing and processing stages of TCM products. This framework seeks to elucidate the intrinsic essence of the key quality attributes of TCM and to provide a systematic approach for addressing common quality issues in TCM. It focuses on tracing and ensuring the traceability and transferability of specific core quality-related substances throughout the entire process—from raw herbal materials to finished TCM products—and on dynamically analyzing and controlling quality across the whole process to guarantee TCM efficacy. [16-17] Currently, the essence of Q-Marker research at its present stage is the investigation of Chinese medicinal compounds that can reflect the efficacy, uniqueness, and safety of traditional Chinese medicines and their products. The key challenges to be overcome lie in the identification of Q-Markers and the exploration of the “property–efficacy–compound” relationship network. [18-19] Conducting Q-Marker studies enables the identification of quality marker components through the linkage among traditional Chinese medicine efficacy, chemical basis, and quality control, thereby establishing a Q-Marker–based quality evaluation model that can serve as a reference for the development of a modernized quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicines.

2.1 The Theory of Medicinal Properties in Traditional Chinese Medicine Q-Marker Quality Assessment

The theory of medicinal properties in traditional Chinese medicine constitutes the epistemology and methodology within the TCM theoretical system. It is a systematic summary derived from objective observations of the body’s responses to herbal medicines, analyzed, generalized, and interpreted through the TCM theoretical framework. This theory is characterized by the mutual interdependence of “nature” and “efficacy,” and primarily encompasses the four natures—warm, hot, cold, and cool; the five flavors—pungent, sour, bitter, sweet, and salty; as well as the principles of ascending, descending, floating, and sinking, and the meridian tropism of herbs. [20-21] Under the guidance of the theoretical system of traditional Chinese medicine, the efficacy and properties of herbal medicines are inextricably linked; for instance, in cases of heat syndromes, the use of cold or cool herbs can alleviate or eliminate the symptoms. By analyzing the correlations between the chemical structures of plant-derived TCM herbs and their pharmacological properties, it has been found that compounds from herbs with similar properties exhibit a high degree of structural similarity. Using metabolomics approaches, the mechanisms underlying the warming and heating effects of Astragalus and its fractionated constituents were investigated, thereby establishing a “property–efficacy–compound” relationship. The results indicate that calycosin exerts its warming effect by upregulating the expression of key proteins in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α)/nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) signaling pathway, thereby modulating glycerophospholipid and unsaturated fatty acid metabolism and influencing energy metabolism—this constitutes the material basis for the warming and heating effects of Astragalus. [22-23] Conducting Q-Marker research, guided by the theoretical framework of traditional Chinese medicine, can begin with an analysis of the correlation between the properties of Chinese medicinal materials and their material basis, focusing on the “property–efficacy–component” relationship to achieve precise identification of Q-Markers, thereby enabling quality evaluation that reflects the “property–efficacy–component” triad.

2.2 Principles of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compatibility Q-Marker Quality Assessment

Traditional Chinese medicinal formulas are a crucial manifestation and primary therapeutic modality of TCM, grounded in the principles of syndrome differentiation and individualized treatment as well as the holistic perspective. As the saying goes, “A formula is composed through the combination of herbs,” and the rules governing herb compatibility are employed to guide the formulation of these prescriptions, with particular emphasis on the principles of “seven emotions and six harmonies” and the hierarchical structure of “sovereign, minister, assistant, and messenger.” [24] In traditional Chinese medicine, formulae are composed by selecting herbs in accordance with the pattern, symptoms, and disease, while taking into account the primary and secondary aspects of the pathological changes, the relationship between root and manifestation, the urgency of the condition, and the vertical hierarchy. The careful combination of herbs, tailored to their individual properties, embodies the holistic and dynamic perspective of TCM. [25] The formulation of herbal prescriptions emphasizes a hierarchical and orderly arrangement of principal and auxiliary ingredients: the chief herb is typically used in the largest dosage to address the patient’s primary disease or principal syndrome, while the assistant herbs, when combined with the chief herb either synergistically or as facilitators, can enhance the formula’s therapeutic efficacy against the primary condition or provide supportive treatment for concomitant diseases or syndromes. The adjuvant herbs further assist the chief and assistant herbs in exerting their therapeutic effects and help harmonize the entire formula. This “chief–assistant–adjuvant–facilitator” compositional structure underscores the hierarchical distinction among the herbs in a prescription, reflecting the systematic nature of herbal compatibility as well as the reciprocal relationship between dosage and efficacy—features that can guide the discovery and identification of Q-Markers for both formulas and pharmaceutical preparations. By applying network pharmacology techniques and leveraging the characteristics of Q-Markers, we have preliminarily identified rhein, aloe-emodin, physcion, chrysophanol, sennoside B, (±)-catechin, and gallic acid as the Q-Markers of Taohu Chengqi Tang and its chief herb, rhubarb, which exerts its blood-activating and stasis-resolving effects in the context of stroke. [26]

2.3 Structure-activity relationship Q-Marker Quality Assessment

For single-compound drugs, since the therapeutic efficacy is directly proportional to the content of the active ingredient, quality evaluation can be achieved through quantitative determination of that ingredient. However, due to the multi-component nature of traditional Chinese medicines and the complex formulation and compatibility inherent in TCM compound prescriptions, controlling only a single component fails to accurately reflect the true quality of the preparation. The TCM fingerprint profile is a widely accepted method for evaluating the quality of TCM in China; it provides a visual representation of the chemical constituents and their relative amounts, thereby revealing the chemical characteristics of the medicinal material. This approach enables quality assessment from a chemical-information perspective. Furthermore, spectrum–effect relationship analysis integrates the chemical information conveyed by the fingerprint profile with the pharmacological effects, making it a valuable tool for identifying biomarkers that truly reflect the intrinsic quality of the product. [27-28] Traditional Chinese medicine fingerprinting technology, combined with chemometric techniques such as cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and similarity evaluation, can comprehensively characterize the relative relationships among the chemical constituents of medicinal materials, thereby enabling quality assessment of both crude TCM herbs and TCM products. [29-30] . Using the spectrum–effect relationship research approach, by establishing the Tibetan medicinal plant Saussurea integrifolia Meconopsis integrifolia (Maxim.) Fingerprint profile of Franch’s whole herb (excluding the floral parts used in medicinal applications) (HMI) extract, with its constituent components analyzed by liquid–mass spectrometry; principal component analysis and grey relational analysis were employed to establish the relationship between the common peaks in the HMI extract fingerprint and its antioxidant activity; high-speed counter-current chromatography was used for separation, providing a reference for research on HMI quality evaluation and quality-control indicators. [31]

2.4 Network pharmacology Q-Marker Quality Assessment

The identification of Q-Markers should comprehensively consider as many chemical constituents as possible in traditional Chinese medicines, with those identified through preliminary screening being selected for further analysis. Literature retrieval is a commonly used approach for pinpointing the sources of Q-Markers; however, it suffers from incomplete knowledge integration, a lack of systematic analysis, and unclear relational networks. Network pharmacology, a novel methodology rooted in systems biology, pharmacology, and molecular network science, constructs “component–target” interaction networks to uncover the latent relationships between active constituents and their mechanisms of action. At both the molecular and systemic levels, this approach can identify bioactive components along with their potential targets and underlying mechanisms, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of predicting the specific disease-targets and mechanistic pathways through which traditional Chinese medicines exert therapeutic effects. [32-34] This clarifies the “efficacy–component–mechanism” relationship. In recent years, network pharmacology has been widely applied to research on the source identification of Q-Markers. By employing fingerprinting techniques, five chemical constituents in the aqueous decoction of Paeonia lactiflora and in Danggui Sini Tang were identified, elucidating the patterns of component transmission and demonstrating the traceability and measurability of Q-Markers. Furthermore, network pharmacology was used to analyze the regulatory signaling pathways of ten core targets, thereby constructing a “component–target–pathway” network to evaluate their efficacy and provide a scientific basis for predicting Q-Marker profiles. [35]

2.5 Drug Metabolism Q-Marker Quality Assessment

The effective absorption of chemical constituents in the body and their pharmacokinetic patterns constitute the material basis and objective rationale for the therapeutic efficacy of traditional Chinese medicines. The spectrum–effect relationship links chemical constituents to the pharmacological actions of TCM, reflecting the intrinsic quality of the formulation as a whole; however, it does not account for the in vivo metabolic processes of the drugs. Only when a drug is sufficiently absorbed and reaches its target sites can it exert a therapeutic effect. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate information on chemical constituents, pharmacological effects of TCM, and the metabolic processes of absorbed components—i.e., to conduct research on the “spectrum–effect–metabolism” relationship. In recent years, numerous biomarkers have been identified through analysis of blood metabolites, which are of great significance for the discovery of Q-markers and for the quality evaluation of TCM. [36-37] Tangzhiqing tablets can be used in the treatment of diabetes; however, their quality assessment remains at a preliminary stage. Based on qualitative, quantitative, and dose–exposure–response analyses, it was found that the glucose-lowering efficacy of Tangzhiqing tablets increases with increasing dosage. Furthermore, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was employed to identify potential Q-markers in plasma, and the results indicated that nuciferine and paeoniflorin exhibit a clockwise hysteresis relative to the glucose-lowering effect of Tangzhiqing tablets. [38]

2.6  Q-Marker Establishment of a Quality Evaluation Model

Conducting research on the quality of traditional Chinese medicines and establishing and refining a comprehensive quality evaluation system are pivotal for the modernization and internationalization of TCM. The Q-Marker theory embodies the distinctive features and advantages of TCM, enabling multi-level and multidimensional analysis of TCM efficacy to identify key quality determinants. Based on the five principles of Q-Markers—efficacy, uniqueness, measurability, traceability and transmission, and compatibility environment—material screening is carried out through pharmacological characterization, bio-attribute indicators, in vivo exposure assessment, and pharmacokinetic profiling, thereby elucidating the intrinsic relationships among “nature–components–efficacy” and constructing a network of quality rules. Ultimately, qualitative and quantitative analytical methods for multiple-component indicators are established, translating chemical constituents into quality metrics and closely linking TCM efficacy with quality-control marker components that reflect the material basis, thus facilitating the formulation of TCM quality standards. Conducting Q-Marker research and developing a Q-Marker–centered TCM quality evaluation model (Figure 1) can help address the fragmentation and systemic deficiencies in existing TCM quality evaluation systems, providing a valuable reference for the development and refinement of TCM quality standard frameworks. This paper explores the establishment of a Q-Marker–based TCM quality evaluation model.

3 A Discussion on the Innovative Development Trends of Quality Evaluation Systems

The multi-component, multi-target nature of traditional Chinese medicine, coupled with its broad therapeutic effects and complex formulation principles, poses significant challenges to quality evaluation. The prevailing mainstream approach to quality assessment—modelled on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of individual chemical compounds in Western pharmaceuticals for quality control—fails to fully leverage the unique strengths and distinctive characteristics of TCM. Innovation in this field must be grounded in inheritance and guided by the principle of “upholding fundamental principles while fostering innovation.” As TCM constitutes a disciplinary branch within the broader TCM system, the development of a modernized quality-evaluation framework must be conducted under the guidance of TCM theory. By applying the holistic perspective inherent in TCM theory to refine and elucidate the material basis of TCM’s pharmacological actions and the contextual factors governing formula compatibility, we can clarify the distinctions between TCM and chemical-drug quality research and thereby provide a systematic theoretical foundation for building a modern TCM quality-assessment system. Innovating in quality evaluation by exploring the interrelationship among “nature–efficacy–components” represents a viable approach: integrating TCM’s theory of medicinal properties into the conceptual framework of TCM efficacy, employing TCM philosophical thought to comprehensively explain the mechanisms underlying TCM’s therapeutic effects, and fully demonstrating the advantages of TCM theory in constructing a modern quality-assessment system. At present, the TCM industry is enjoying robust growth; however, due to the inherent disconnect between the traditional TCM intellectual framework and the modern pharmaceutical system, the existing TCM quality-assessment system faces numerous pressing issues that urgently require resolution. Consequently, an increasing number of professionals in the field are recognizing the critical importance of TCM theory for TCM quality evaluation.

 

3.1 Process Visualization Quality Assessment

Process visualization technology is primarily applied in research on the manufacturing processes of traditional Chinese medicine preparations. By employing state-of-the-art instrumentation to monitor the entire production process, it enables comprehensive control over each stage of TCM manufacturing and has gradually become a mainstream approach to quality control. Its advanced nature lies in overcoming the inherent lag associated with conventional testing; it allows for the tracing of the root causes of quality deviations, rather than relying solely on the minimum detection limits specified for TCM products as the basis for quality assurance. [39] This insight suggests that a modern quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine can be established by developing and applying visualized analytical methods for process quality attributes, thereby enabling the identification of critical quality links, the assessment of key quality attributes, and the comprehensive control of these attributes throughout the entire production and use process, with full traceability of any issues that arise. From the time of harvest to the moment they enter the body, the chemical constituents of crude medicinal materials are subject to a wide range of influencing factors, undergoing complex and diverse transformations; the “efficacious components” are in a state of constant change. The selection of the medicinal part, the harvesting period, the place of origin, the processing methods, the post-harvest handling, the formulation process, and the in vivo metabolism and absorption all exert significant influences on the “efficacious components,” thereby affecting the accuracy and specificity of the quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine. [40-46] The key to quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicines lies in research on their material basis. To refine the quality evaluation system for TCM, it is essential to focus on the “efficacious constituents” as critical process parameters, comprehensively accounting for factors that influence variations in these constituents at pivotal stages of the production and pharmacological processes. This approach should provide all-round process control spanning from raw medicinal materials through finished formulations to in vivo behavior, thereby enabling visualized monitoring of the critical quality attributes of “efficacious constituents” throughout the entire process. For example, the phenol–sulfuric acid method can be employed to determine the total polysaccharide content in each operational unit of fermented Cordyceps militaris powder, while near-infrared spectroscopy can be integrated to develop a partial least squares regression (PLSR) quantitative analysis model for the entire production chain. Such a model can be used to assess the quality-control levels of different operational units within the production chain of fermented Cordyceps militaris powder, enabling rapid quality assessment of the product and providing a valuable reference for establishing a comprehensive quality-evaluation framework for total polysaccharides in this formulation. [47] Essentially, a Q-Marker is a “pharmacologically active constituent” with traceability characteristics; the application of process visualization technologies in Q-Marker research is of great significance for developing a modern quality evaluation model centered on Q-Markers.

3.2 Digital Quality Assessment

In the context of big data, efficient knowledge management, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge sharing are of paramount importance. Data and information serve as the direct manifestation of scientific and technological achievements; as scientific research deepens, the volume of scientific data and information is growing exponentially. Traditional data-mining and knowledge-discovery methods struggle to efficiently extract information, data, and knowledge. The construction of knowledge bases can support discipline-resource development and personalized services in data-intensive environments, enabling researchers to quickly and accurately locate the knowledge they need, organize knowledge structures, and efficiently acquire and utilize domain-specific knowledge. [48-49] Data mining and knowledge integration serve as guiding forces for the innovative reform of the current quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine; moreover, these technologies constitute effective tools for transforming resource management and research outcomes into practical applications in the context of modern big data. After decades of research, the field of TCM quality studies has amassed a vast body of literature and data. By leveraging knowledge-base construction techniques to integrate this massive pool of information on TCM quality research, it becomes possible to achieve standardized and efficient integration of TCM quality data and knowledge, as well as to uncover underlying patterns and principles. Authentic medicinal materials represent an original, comprehensive indicator for evaluating TCM quality; their associated literature and research data are diverse and voluminous, yet highly fragmented and characterized by loose connections among knowledge structures. Through data-mining approaches, we can collect, screen, and organize data on the morphological, microscopic, ecological, and genetic characteristics of these materials, thereby constructing the foundational components of a knowledge base for authentic medicinal materials. [50] . Taking the construction of a Q-Marker knowledge base as an example, data mining techniques are applied. [51] Complete knowledge extraction and processing through data processing methods, applying soft computing. [52] , Semantic Constraints [53] Complete the organization and classification of knowledge, and construct a knowledge base with Q-Markers as the core, Chinese medicinal varieties as the basic units, the five principles of Q-Markers as the regulatory framework, and “nature–efficacy–components”–related knowledge as the foundational content. Develop a domain ontology and convert it into a data format to enable the storage, retrieval, and querying of knowledge, thereby facilitating the sharing of Q-Marker knowledge.

4 Conclusion

Establish a quality evaluation system for traditional Chinese medicine guided by innovative methodologies, integrating the concepts of medicinal properties and compatibility environments; explore the correlations among medicinal properties, therapeutic efficacy, and the material basis of TCM herbs; construct visualized relational networks; and strive to modernize the philosophical foundations of classical TCM. By leveraging information technology, demonstrate the potential for end-to-end visualized quality control and evaluation, thereby facilitating the establishment and refinement of a comprehensive quality evaluation system spanning the entire TCM industry chain. The advanced nature of this approach lies in its reliance on the theoretical underpinnings of TCM to systematically elucidate the close relationship between the material basis of TCM herbs and their therapeutic effectiveness, distill quality indicators from a holistic perspective, and achieve visibility, controllability, and traceability of key quality determinants—thereby reflecting the efficacy and safety of TCM through multi-level, multi-dimensional considerations.